Press
For interviews, data requests, or assets, email contact@prepublish.ai with “Press” in the subject. We typically reply within 24 hours.
About Prepublish
Short, copy and paste:
Prepublish (prepublish.ai) is a YouTube script QA tool creators run before they record. It flags weak hooks, pacing risk, and the passages most likely to lose viewers, then returns a copy-paste rewrite for each one.
Long, copy and paste:
Prepublish (prepublish.ai) is a YouTube script QA tool creators run before they record. A creator pastes a script, uploads a video, or drops in audio, and the analysis scores hook, structure, and pacing, maps where the draft is most likely to lose attention, and returns the exact problem text, a rewrite, and the reason the change works. Every check also names which categories in YouTube’s published guidelines the text matches. The free check shows the single biggest issue with its rewrite; the Creator plan at $29 a month unlocks every fix. Prepublish publishes its research with row-level data, including a preregistered replication that failed and was published anyway.
Fast facts
- Product
- Prepublish, a YouTube script QA tool
- Website
- prepublish.ai
- Built for
- YouTube creators who write a script before they record
- Pricing
- Free script check; Creator $29/month; Studio $99/month
- Press contact
- contact@prepublish.ai
Research you can cite
Every study publishes its row-level data, so any number can be checked against the original video. Please link the study page when you cite it.
- We Analyzed 349 YouTube Hooks. Most Hook Advice Did Not Survive.
The first 45 seconds of 349 videos from 36 channels, 254 million combined views. Speaking pace and time to payoff showed no difference between hits and flops. Concreteness did.
- We Bet Our Own Hook Study Would Replicate on Small Channels. It Did Not.
A preregistered replication on 96 channels between 1,000 and 20,000 subscribers, 941 analyzed videos. None of the three patterns held up.
- YouTube Script Statistics 2026
Word counts, speaking rate, hooks, and flops compiled from both studies: 1,290 videos from 132 channels. Median speaking rate in the 349-video study was 181 words per minute.
Topics we can comment on
- Why the script is the cheapest place to fix a YouTube video, and what creators miss before they record
- What held up, and what did not, when popular hook advice was tested against real videos
- AI-written and faceless channel scripts, and the YouTube guideline categories they run into
- The YouTube Partner Program entry bar doubling on 1 February 2027, and what it means for small channels
- Creator tools inside AI assistants: Prepublish runs as a public MCP server
Brand assets
Write the name as “Prepublish”. For a look at a real report, see the example analysis.